Coming soon to this journal
Ethics, end-of-life decisions and grief
Author:
Professor Kenneth J. Doka a
| Affiliation: | a The College of New Rochelle & The Hospice Foundation of America, USA |
DOI:
10.1080/13576270500031105
Publication Frequency:
4 issues per year
Subjects:
Counseling;
Death;
Death & Dying;
Death Studies;
Gerontology/Ageing;
Grief & Trauma Counseling - Adult;
Grief & Trauma Counseling - Children & Adolescents;
Health & Medical Anthropology;
Medical Sociology;
Palliative Care Nursing;
Pastoral Counseling;
Social Work with the Elderly;
Sociology of Religion;
Specialist Care;
Number of References: 15
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
Ethical end-of-life decisions do more than prolong or terminate a life. These ethical decisions may haunt survivors long after the death occurs. They may complicate grief, creating family dissension, inhibiting support and increasing ambivalence over the nature or circumstances of the death. Conversely, end-of-life decisions may not always be negative. In other circumstances, they may facilitate the grief process, allowing survivors a meaningful end to the story of a loved one, providing survivors a modicum of control that ends a person's pain, following the deceased wishes, or simply seeming to survivors to be the right thing to do. This article explores the ways that end-of-life decisions influence grief, offering suggestions on factors that might mitigate problematic outcomes.
|
| Keywords: End-of-life ethics; ethics; ethics and grief |
| view references (15) |

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea