Bilateral trade wars
Authors:
Mordechai E. Kreinin a;
Elias Dinopoulos b;
Constantinos Syropoulos c
| Affiliations: | a Professor of Economics, Michigan State University, |
| b Professor of Economics, University of Florida, | |
| c Assistant Professor of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, |
DOI:
10.1080/08853909608523845
Publication Frequency:
4 issues per year
Subjects:
Business & Management;
Development Economics;
Globalisation;
International Business;
International Economics;
International Political Economy;
International Trade (incl. trade agreements & tariffs);
Management & Management Techniques;
Politics of International Trade;
Formats available:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
Abstract
The paper constructs a three-country, two-good general equilibrium model to analyze the welfare effects of bilateral trade wars. The presence of a third country (or a number of countries) pursuing free trade policies alters several results based on a two-country framework: Regardless of whether tariffs or quotas are used, bilateral trade wars need not eliminate trade between the two retaliating countries; even a “small” retaliating country can win a bilateral trade war; and quotas can be welfare-superior to tariffs under bilateral retaliation.
|
| view references (13) |

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea