ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Forthcoming Articles       Volume 14 Issue 1       Subscribe       Article       References       Cited By       Related articles      
firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

A connectionist approach to processing dimensional interaction 

Authors: Adriaan G. Tijsseling; Mark A. Gluck
DOI: 10.1080/09540090210138594
Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year
Published in: journal Connection Science, Volume 14, Issue 1 March 2002 , pages 1 - 48
Number of References: 79
Formats available: PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions
View Article: View Article (PDF) View Article (PDF)


Abstract

The difference between integral and separable interaction of dimensions is a classic problem in cognitive psychology (Garner 1970, American Psychologist, 25: 350-358, Shepard 1964, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1: 54-87) and remains an essential component of most current experimental and theoretical analyses of category learning (e.g. Ashby and Maddox 1994, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38: 423-466, Goldstone 1994, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 123: 178-200, Kruschke 1993, Connection Science, 5: 3-36, Melara et al. 1993, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19: 1082-1104, Nosofsky 1992, Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition, Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum). So far the problem has been addressed through post hoc analysis in which empirical evidence of integral and separable processing is used to fit human data, showing how the impact of a pair of dimensions interacting in an integral or a separable manner enters into later learning processes. In this paper, we argue that a mechanistic connectionist explanation for variations in dimensional interactions can provide a new perspective through exploration of how similarities between stimuli are transformed from physical to psychological space when learning to identify, discriminate and categorize them. We substantiate this claim by demonstrating how even a standard backpropagation network combined with a simple image-processing Gabor filter component provides limited but clear potential to process monochromatic stimuli that are composed of integral pairs of dimensions differently from monochromatic stimuli that are composed of separable pairs of dimensions. Interestingly, the responses from Gabor filters are shown already to capture most ofthe dimensional interaction, which in turn can be operated upon by the neural network during a given learning task. In addition, we introduce a basic attention mechanism to back-propagation that gives it the ability to attend selectively to relevant dimensions and illustrate how this serves the model in solving a filtration versus condensation task (Kruschke 1993, Connection Science, 5: 3-36). The model may serve as a starting point in characterizing the general properties of the human perceptual system that causes some pairs of physical dimensions to be treated as integrally interacting and other pairs as separable. An improved understanding of these properties will aid studies in perceptual and category learning, selective attention effects and influences of higher cognitive processes on initial perceptual representations.
Keywords: Integral And Separable Dimensions; Connectionism; Gabor Filters
view references (79) : view citations
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2010 Informa plc