ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Forthcoming Articles       Volume 25 Issue 3       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
<< firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

Technical note: An evaluation of interpolation methods for Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) data 

Authors: O. Abramov a; A. McEwen a
Affiliation:   a Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA
DOI: 10.1080/01431160310001599006
Publication Frequency: 24 issues per year
Published in: journal International Journal of Remote Sensing, Volume 25, Issue 3 February 2004 , pages 669 - 676
Number of References: 10
Formats available: PDF (English)
Also incorporating: Remote Sensing Reviews
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions
View Article: View Article (PDF) View Article (PDF)


Abstract

The Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) instrument on the Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) spacecraft has returned a large amount of data on the topography of Mars. It is possible to generate high resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) from these data by employing data interpolation techniques. Four interpolation algorithms were selected for testing on MOLA data: Delaunay-based linear interpolation, splining, nearest neighbour, and natural neighbour. These methods were applied to the MOLA data of Korolev crater for qualitative analysis. In addition, a DEM of a part of Iceland was used for quantitative testing by simulating MOLA data acquisition, interpolating those data, and then calculating the mean absolute error (MAE) between the interpolated and original DEM. Execution speeds were measured for the four algorithms. The natural neighbour method proved superior both quantitatively and qualitatively to other methods tested, but is relatively slow computationally.
view references (10)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2009 Informa plc