This paper proposes and illustrates a decision analytical approach to compare the value of alternative spatial data sets. In contrast to other work addressing value of information, its focus is on value of control. This is a useful concept when choosing the best data set for decision making under uncertainty due to error in the reported data. Application of the concept requires probabilistic accuracy measures and a loss function representing the cost of incorrect judgement about some target property. This is illustrated by an assessment of the suitability of two digital elevation models (DEMs) for determining the volume of sand required for building a container port. To demonstrate flexibility of the approach, accuracy assessment was based on both a random and a systematic sample of error data, using design-based estimation and model-based prediction, that is geostatistics. Analysis results included the expected loss for each combination of DEM and sampling strategy. These indicated that both DEMs were equally suitable for the intended use. Operational practicability of the method is highly dependent on the willingness of database producers to give access to sample information similar to the quick looks provided to potential users of remote sensing imagery.