ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Forthcoming Articles       Volume 81 Issue 1       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
<< firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

A superior random number generator for visiting distribution in GSA 

Authors: Jyhjeng Deng a;  Hsinshih Chen a;  Chunlan Chang a; Zhongxiah Yang a
Affiliation:   a Industrial Engineering Department, DaYeh University, Changhua, Taiwan, Republic of China
DOI: 10.1080/00207160310001620768
Publication Frequency: 12 issues per year
Published in: journal International Journal of Computer Mathematics, Volume 81, Issue 1 January 2004 , pages 103 - 120
Number of References: 17
Formats available: PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions
View Article: View Article (PDF) View Article (PDF)


Abstract

Tsallis's generalized simulated annealing (GSA), which has been widely used in many fields as a global optimization tool, is composed of three parts: visiting distribution, accepting rule, and cooling schedule. The most complicated of these is visiting distribution. Although Tsallis and Stariolo did provide a heuristic algorithm to generate a random number for the visiting distribution, empirical simulations have shown that it is inappropriate. In this study a more appropriate algorithm, provided by the inspiration of Mantegna, is composed of two steps. The first is the calculation v = x/|y|1/agr, where x and y are two independent normal variates with zero means and standard deviation σx and σy respectively. The second is a nonlinear transformation w = lcub[K(q) - 1]exp(-|v/C(q)|) + 1rcubv. Theoretical arguments are provided for the choice of agr, σx, σy, and K(q); whereas for C(q), an empirical approximation is used instead. The range of q is in the open interval of (1.0, 3.0). It is shown that both old and new algorithms behave like a normal and Cauchy variates, respectively, when q is in the right limit of 1 or equals 2.0, values which match their corresponding visiting distributions exactly. The criteria for comparison are Kolmogorov's statistic and hypothesis testing. Based on the criteria, extensive simulations confirm that the new algorithm is superior to the old when q ∈ (1.0, 2.5]. As for q ∈ (2.5, 3.0), the values are about the same.
Keywords: Generalized simulated annealing; Kolmogorov's statistic; Two-hump effect; Empirical distribution function
view references (17)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2009 Informa plc