Self-forgiveness versus excusing: The roles of remorse, effort, and acceptance of responsibility
Authors:
Mickie L. Fisher - Portions of this research were based on a Masters Thesis at Case Western Reserve University by Mickie L. Fisher. Portions of the research were also presented at the 2004 Positive Psychology Summit.a;
Julie Juola Exline a
| Affiliation: | a Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA |
DOI:
10.1080/15298860600586123
Publication Frequency:
4 issues per year
Subjects:
Self & Social Identity;
Social Psychology;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
Recent self-forgiveness research raises thorny issues: Are people who claim to forgive themselves merely excusing their offenses? Might it be adaptive for people to feel distress after they hurt others? This study asked 138 undergraduates to reflect on times when they offended others. Feelings of self-condemnation were associated with maladjustment, as shown in prior studies. However, participants reported more prosocial responses (repentance and a sense of being humbled) if they accepted responsibility, experienced remorse, and found that reducing negative feelings required effort. Egotism was associated with reluctance to accept responsibility, whereas a more shame-prone, neurotic pattern was associated with self-condemnation. To avoid confounding self-forgiveness with excusing, future studies should include responsibility ratings and should also distinguish between remorse and self-condemnation.
|
| view references (50) : view citations |

Download Citation


CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea