ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Forthcoming Articles       Volume 1 Issue 1       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

The good, the bad, and the ugly: An fMRI investigation of the functional anatomic correlates of stigma 

Authors: Anne C. Krendl a;  C. Neil Macrae b;  William M. Kelley a;  Jonathan A. Fugelsang c; Todd F. Heatherton a
Affiliations:   a Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
b University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
c University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
DOI: 10.1080/17470910600670579
Publication Frequency: 6 issues per year
Published in: journal Social Neuroscience, Volume 1, Issue 1 March 2006 , pages 5 - 15
Formats available: HTML (English) : PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions


Abstract

Social interactions require fast and efficient person perception, which is best achieved through the process of categorization. However, this process can produce pernicious outcomes, particularly in the case of stigma. This study used fMRI to investigate the neural correlates involved in forming both explicit (“Do you like or dislike this person?”) and implicit (“Is this a male or female?”) judgments of people possessing well-established stigmatized conditions (obesity, facial piercings, transsexuality, and unattractiveness), as well as normal controls. Participants also made post-scan disgust ratings on all the faces that they viewed during imaging. These ratings were subsequently examined (modeled linearly) in a parametric analysis. Regions of interest that emerged include areas previously demonstrated to respond to aversive and disgust-inducing material (amygdala and insula), as well as regions strongly associated with inhibition and control (anterior cingulate and lateral prefrontal cortex). Further, greater differences in activation were observed in the implicit condition for both the amygdala and prefrontal cortical regions in response to the most negatively perceived faces. Specifically, as subcortical responses (e.g., amygdala) increased, cortical responses (e.g., lateral PFC and anterior cingulate) also increased, indicating the possibility of inhibitory processing. These findings help elucidate the neural underpinnings of stigma.
view references (59)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2009 Informa plc