Counter-Examples about Lower- and Upper-Bounded Population Growth
Authors:
Jacques Demongeot a;
Jules Waku a
| Affiliation: | a Institut Universitaire de France, TIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Joseph Fourier University of Grenoble, France |
DOI:
10.1080/08898480500301785
Publication Frequency:
4 issues per year
Subjects:
Applied Mathematics;
Economics, Finance, Business & Industry;
Environmental Demography;
Mathematics & Statistics;
Population Geography;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
For a unimodal growth function f having its maximum at a critical state xc, the interval bounding the population size asymptotically is usually presented as being equal to [f
2(xc), f(xc)]. This interval however does not represent the maximum range within which the population size can vary, even asymptotically. The actual invariant interval containing the population size is equal to: [min(x*, f 2(xc)), f(xc)], where x* denotes the non-zero fixed point, assumed to be unique, of the iteration of f.
|
| Keywords: interval iteration; invariant domain; population dynamics; growth model; Verhulst model; Ricker model |
| view references (9) |

Download Citation

2(xc), f(xc)]. This interval however does not represent the maximum range within which the population size can vary, even asymptotically. The actual invariant interval containing the population size is equal to: [min(x*, f
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea