Comparison of methods for melt detection over Greenland using active and passive microwave measurements
Authors:
Ivan S. Ashcraft a;
David G. Long a
| Affiliation: | a Brigham Young University, Microwave Earth Remote Sensing Laboratory, |
DOI:
10.1080/01431160500534465
Publication Frequency:
24 issues per year
Published in:
International Journal of Remote Sensing,
Volume
27,
Issue
12
June
2006
, pages 2469
- 2488
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
Also incorporating: Remote Sensing Reviews
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
Microwave measurements have been used in various studies to detect melt based on their sensitivity to liquid water present in snow. To contrast different melt detection methods used with different sensors, six different melt detection method/sensor combinations are compared using data for the summer of 2000. The sensors include the Special Spectral Microwave Imager (SSM/I), SeaWinds on QuikSCAT (QSCAT), and the European Remote Sensing (ERS) Advanced Microwave Instrument (AMI) in scatterometer mode. Existing melt detection methods are compared with melt detection based on a simple physical model. The model relates the moisture content and depth of a surface melt layer of wet snow to a single channel melt detection threshold. The model can be applied to both active and passive sensors and improves the consistency between brightness temperature (Tb ) and normalized radar backscatter (σ°) based detection of melt. Model-based melt estimates from different sensors are highly correlated and do not exhibit the unnatural phenomenon observed with previous methods. Relative merits and limitations of the various methods are discussed.
|
| view references (15) |

Download Citation


CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea