ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Forthcoming Articles       Volume 19 Issue 1       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

Contextual vocabulary acquisition as computational philosophy and as philosophical computation 1  

Authors: William J. Rapaport a; Michael W. Kibby b
Affiliations:   a Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Department of Philosophy, Department of Linguistics, and Center for Cognitive Science, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
b Department of Learning and Instruction and Center for Literacy and Reading Instruction, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
DOI: 10.1080/09528130601116162
Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year
Published in: journal Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, Volume 19, Issue 1 March 2007 , pages 1 - 17
Formats available: HTML (English) : PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions


Abstract

Contextual vocabulary acquisition (CVA) is the active, deliberate acquisition of a meaning for an unknown word in a text by reasoning from textual clues, prior knowledge, and hypotheses developed from prior encounters with the word, but without external sources of help such as dictionaries or people. Published strategies for CVA vaguely and unhelpfully tell the reader to 'guess'. Artificial intelligence algorithms for CVA can fill in the details that replace 'guessing' by 'computing'; these details can then be converted to a curriculum that can be taught to students to improve their reading comprehension. Such algorithms also suggest a way out of the Chinese Room and show how holistic semantics can withstand certain objections.
1 † This paper is based in part on a talk given by Rapaport at the North American Computing and Philosophy Conference (NA-CAP 2006), Rensselaer Polytechnic University, August 2006. In this paper, ‘I’, ‘my’, etc. refer to Rapaport, and ‘we’, ‘our’, etc. usually refer to Rapaport and Kibby.
view references (65)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2009 Informa plc