Human reasoning about artificial intelligence
Authors:
Patrick J. Hayes a;
Kenneth M. Ford b;
Jack R. Adams-Webber c
| Affiliations: | a Centre for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA |
| b Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL, USA | |
| c Department of Psychology, Brock University, St Catharines, Ontario, Canada |
DOI:
10.1080/09528139208953750
Publication Frequency:
4 issues per year
Published in:
Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence,
Volume
4,
Issue
4
October
1992
, pages 247
- 263
Subjects:
Cognitive Artificial Intelligence.;
Cognitive Psychology;
Cognitive Science;
Evolutionary Computing;
Human Computer Intelligence;
Machine Learning - Design;
Neural Networks;
Robotics;
Systems & Controls;
Formats available:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
Abstract
Recently, several authors (Searle, Penrose, Rychlak) have suggested that AI is a doomed undertaking. In his recent book, Artificial Intelligence and Human Reasoning, Joseph Rychlak repeats many of the arguments of the other critics, as well as offering several of his own. In this paper, taking Rychlak as symptomatic of this new anti-computational intellectual movement, we respond to these arguments and defend AI and personal construct theory against some of the misunderstandings and confusions which we find there.
|
| Keywords: Chinese Room; computation; mechanical psychology; processing levels; anthropocentric constraint; brain/computer distinction |
| view references (31) |

Download Citation

CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea