Image restoration using L1 norm penalty function
Authors:
Vivek Agarwal a;
Andrei V. Gribok a;
Mongi A. Abidi a
| Affiliation: | a Imaging, Robotics, and Intelligent Systems (IRIS) Laboratory, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA |
DOI:
10.1080/17415970600971987
Publication Frequency:
8 issues per year
Published in:
Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering,
Volume
15,
Issue
8
January
2007
, pages 785
- 809
Subjects:
Analysis - Mathematics;
Electrical & Electronic Engineering;
Inverse Problems;
Mathematical Modelling;
Mathematics & Statistics for Engineers;
Mechanical Engineering;
Medical Imaging;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
Previously published as:
Inverse Problems in Engineering
(1068-2767,
1029-0281)
until 2004
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
The process of estimating an original image from a given blurred and noisy image is known as image restoration. It is an ill-posed inverse problem, since one of the ways of solving it requires finding a solution to a Fredholm integral equation of convolution type in two-dimensional space. The focus of the article is to achieve a quality edge preserving image restoration using a less expensive (fast) regularization technique with L1 norm penalty function. L1 norm based approaches do not penalize edges or high frequency contents in the restored image compared to L2 norm based approaches. Total variation (TV) is an established L1 norm regularization approach that performs edge preserving image restoration, but at a high computational cost. TV regularization requires linearization of a highly nonlinear penalty term, which increases the restoration time considerably for large scale images. In order to reduce the computational cost, we extend least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), an L1 norm minimization statistical modeling technique to image restoration. The penalty function of LASSO is an identity matrix so it is computationally fast. The metrics, like, residual error, peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), restoration time, edge map of the restored image, and subjective visual evaluation are used to assess the performances of both methods. Based on our experimental results, we show that LASSO achieves similar quality of edge preserving restoration as TV regularization, and is approximately two times faster in computation compared to TV regularization on the same set of images. We also analyze the impact of the different degree of blurring caused by point spread functions (PSFs) corrupted by different signal to noise ratios (SNRs) on image restoration.
|
| Keywords: Image restoration; L1 norm penalty functions; Total variation regularization; LASSO regularization; Adaptive ridge regression |
| view references (29) |

Download Citation


CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea