Resurrecting the Test-Ban Treaty
Author:
Michael O'Hanlon - Michael O'Hanlon is a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution, where he is directing the Opportunity 08 project, and continuing to be senior author of the Iraq Index. He has authored or coauthored four books on technical issues in defence policy during 13 years at Brookings; before that, he spent five years at the Congressional Budget Office specialising in nuclear-weapons issues.
DOI:
10.1080/00396330801899421
Publication Frequency:
6 issues per year
Subjects:
Security Studies - Military & Strategic;
Security Studies - Pol & Intl Relns;
Strategic Studies;
Formats available:
PDF
(English)
You have:
FREE ACCESS
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
Abstract
The comprehensive test-ban treaty makes very good strategic sense for the United States and the world. The next American president should build on Bill Clinton's signing of that treaty, as well as George W. Bush's tacit compliance with its strictures, and send it to the US Senate for ratification. It makes sense whether Iran tests its own nuclear weapon in the coming years or not; either way, Washington will need more capacity to apply more pressure on states like Iran, and the treaty could help it garner international support for such pressure. American ratification of the treaty might also be part of a deal by which India and Pakistan agree not to do more testing themselves, joining the United States in a pledge of future restraint.
|

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea