ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 
Advert: Informa Healthcare - http://www.informahealthcare.com

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Forthcoming Articles       Volume 27 Issue 4       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
<< firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

The size and mix of government spending on illicit drug policy in Australia 

Author: Timothy J. Moore - Timothy J. Moore MEc(Hons), Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.a
Affiliation:   a Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
DOI: 10.1080/09595230802093737
Publication Frequency: 6 issues per year
Published in: journal Drug and Alcohol Review, Volume 27, Issue 4 July 2008 , pages 404 - 413
Formats available: HTML (English) : PDF (English)

The circumstances under which this title is published have changed:

Reason for change: Changed Publisher
Now published by: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Date of change: 2009



Abstract

Aim. To estimate how much governments in Australia spend on reducing and dealing with illicit drug problems. Methods. Government documents and supplementary information sources were used to estimate drug-related expenditure for the financial year 2002-03, in Australian dollars. Public sector expenditure on reducing drug problems ('proactive expenditure') was classified into four policy functions: prevention, treatment, harm reduction and enforcement. Expenditure related to the consequences of drug use ('reactive expenditure') was included as a separate category. Results. Spending by Australian governments in financial year 2002-03 on all drug-related activities was estimated to be $3.2 billion. Proactive expenditure was estimated to be $1.3 billion, comprising 55% on enforcement, 23% on prevention, 17% on treatment, 3% on harm reduction and 1% on activities that span several of these functions. Expenditure on dealing with the consequences of drug use was estimated to be $1.9 billion, with the majority the result of crime-related consequences. Conclusion. Several insights result from estimating these expenditures. First, law enforcement is the largest drug policy component, with Australian governments also spending significant amounts on treatment and prevention programmes. Secondly, apart from the prevention component, Australia's drug policy mix is strikingly similar to recent international estimates. Finally, expenditures associated with dealing with the consequences of illicit drugs are large and important for assessing drug-related public sector expenditure. [Moore TJ. The size and mix of government spending on illicit drug policy in Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev 2008;27:404-413]
Keywords: budgets; cross-national comparisons; drug policy; harm reduction; law enforcement; prevention; treatment
view references (43)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2010 Informa plc