ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Volume 38 Issue 3       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
<< firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

(Re)Charting the (Dis)Courses of Faith and Politics, or Rhetoric and Democracy in the Burkean Barnyard 

Authors: Michael-John DePalma - Michael-John DePalma is a Ph.D. candidate in Composition Studies at the University of New Hampshire, Department of English, Hamilton Smith Hall, Durham, NH 03824, USA. E-mail: mmz6@unh.edu.a;  Jeffrey M. Ringer - Jeffrey M. Ringer and Jim Webber are also Ph.D. students at the University of New Hamphsire.b; Jim Webber - Jeffrey M. Ringer and Jim Webber are also Ph.D. students at the University of New Hamphsire.b
Affiliations:   a Department of English, Hamilton Smith Hall, candidate in Composition Studies at the University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
b students at the University of New Hamphsire,
DOI: 10.1080/02773940802167575
Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year
Published in: journal Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Volume 38, Issue 3 June 2008 , pages 311 - 334
Formats available: HTML (English) : PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions


Abstract

In recent years, scholars in rhetoric and composition studies have given increased attention to the various ways that rhetoric and religion intersect. To explore this relationship further, this article employs Kenneth Burke's dramatistic pentad and the methods of pentadic analysis proposed by Floyd Anderson and Lawrence Prelli in order to analyze two texts, Crowley's Toward a Civil Discourseand Obama's “Pentecost 2006 Keynote Address.” In our analysis, we aim to reveal the motives locked within Crowley's and Obama's texts to demonstrate how their attempts to open the universe of discourse—that is, to provide ways of bridging the divide between political liberals and religious conservatives—shut down the possibility for dialogue. We then offer counterstatements—what Anderson and Prelli refer to as “expressions of alternative orientations toward social reality” (90)—that may serve to open the universe of discourse.
view references (35)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2009 Informa plc