The California Consensus: Can Private Aid End Global Poverty?
Authors:
Raj M. Desai - Raj M. Desai is Associate Professor of International Development at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and a visiting fellow at the Wolfensohn Center for Development at the Brookings Institution. He has served as a consultant to the World Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank, the United Nations Development Programme and other international organisations.; Homi Kharas - Homi Kharas is a Senior Fellow at the Wolfensohn Center for Development at the Brookings Institution and a member of the Working Group for the Commission on Growth and Development. He previously worked at the World Bank, serving as Chief Economist for the East Asia and Pacific region, and as Director for Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, Finance and Private Sector Development.
DOI:
10.1080/00396330802328982
Publication Frequency:
6 issues per year
Subjects:
Security Studies - Military & Strategic;
Security Studies - Pol & Intl Relns;
Strategic Studies;
Formats available:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
Abstract
Global philanthropy is remaking the relationship between the world's rich and poor. Private aid - aid provided by foundations, corporations, non-governmental organisations, and individuals - has doubled over the past decade and may soon overtake 'official' foreign aid. Something of a consensus has developed around the emergence of private aid - that is it is less prone to corruption and more likely to benefit the poor. While private aid has the potential to be a more effective form of aid, it remains vulnerable to many of the same problems affecting official development assistance. Private aid that is both accountable and well monitored, however, can potentially catalyse more competitive markets for foreign aid, and dismantle the monopoly held by traditional bilateral and multilateral donors.
|

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea