LQ suboptimal decentralised controllers with disturbance rejection property for hierarchical systems
Authors:
Javad Lavaei a;
Ahmadreza Momeni b;
Amir G. Aghdam b
| Affiliations: | a Department of Control and Dynamical Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA |
b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montr al, QC H3G 1M8, Canada |
DOI:
10.1080/00207170701837363
Publication Frequency:
12 issues per year
Published in:
International Journal of Control,
Volume
81,
Issue
11
November
2008
, pages 1720
- 1732
First Published:
November
2008
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
Previously published as:
Journal of Electronics and Control
(0368-1947)
until 1965
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
This article is concerned with decentralised output regulation of hierarchical systems subject to input and output disturbances. It is assumed that the disturbance can be represented as the output of an autonomous linear time invariant (LTI) system with an unknown initial state. The primary objective is to design a decentralised controller with the property that not only does it reject the degrading effect of the disturbance on the output (to achieve a satisfactory steady-state performance), it also results in a small linear quadratic (LQ) cost function (implying a good transient behaviour). To this end, the underlying problem is treated in two phases. In the first step, a number of modified systems are defined in terms of the original system. The problem of designing an LQ centralised controller which stabilises all the modified systems and rejects the disturbance in the original system is considered, and it is shown that this centralised controller can be found efficiently by solving a linear matrix inequality (LMI) problem. In the second step, a method recently presented in the literature is exploited to decentralise the designed centralised controller. It is shown that the obtained controller satisfies the prescribed design specifications including disturbance rejection. Finally, in a more pragmatic context, the system is assumed to be subject to input delay, and a robustness analysis is carried out accordingly. Simulation results elucidate the efficacy of the proposed control law.
|
| Keywords: decentralised control; optimal control; disturbance rejection; LMI; distributed systems |
| view references (34) |

Download Citation

al, QC H3G 1M8, Canada
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea