A Comparison of Internet and Face-to-Face (FTF) Qualitative Methods in Studying the Relationships of Gay Men
Authors:
Brad van Eeden-Moorefield a;
Christine M. Proulx b;
Kay Pasley c
| Affiliations: | a Department of Human Environmental Studies, Central Michigan University, 205 Wightman Hall, Mount Pleasant, MI |
| b Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO | |
| c Dept. of Child and Family Sciences, College of Human Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL |
DOI:
10.1080/15504280802096856
Publication Frequency:
4 issues per year
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
Although the Internet increasingly is part of our daily interactions, it remains largely unexplored as a qualitative research medium. Because most research on the relationships of gay men uses homogeneous samples, which are often difficult to locate, the Internet provides a methodological opportunity to obtain a more diverse set of perspectives of the lived experiences of participants. Our primary interests here are to discuss the processes and ethics of using Internet focus groups and in-depth interviews compared to traditional face-to-face (FTF) methods and to discuss the trustworthiness and quality of data garnered from the use of Internet methods. Using previous literature and our own experiences conducting Internet-based and FTF qualitative research that explored the relationships of gay men as well as data from this study, we suggest that using the Internet as a qualitative research medium can enhance sample recruitment and result in data that is trustworthy. Additionally, we offer suggestions for online moderating.
|
| Keywords: Gay couples; Internet; qualitative research; research methods |
| view references (39) |

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea