Fitness to plead and competence to stand trial: a systematic review of the constructs and their application
Authors:
T. P. Rogers a;
N. J. Blackwood ab;
F. Farnham b;
G. J. Pickup c;
M. J. Watts bc
| Affiliations: | a Department of Forensic Mental Health Science, Kings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, UK |
| b North London Forensic Service, Barnet, Enfield, and Haringey Mental Health Trust, London, UK | |
| c Sub-Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, UK |
DOI:
10.1080/14789940801947909
Publication Frequency:
6 issues per year
Published in:
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology,
Volume
19,
Issue
4
December
2008
, pages 576
- 596
Subjects:
Aggression in Adults;
Criminology;
Criminology & Delinquency;
Ethics & Legal issues in Mental Health;
Psychiatry: Forensic Psychiatry;
Psychiatry & Clinical Psychology - Adult: Forensic Psychiatry;
Psychological Disorders - Adult;
Social Psychology;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
Previously published as:
The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry
(0958-5184,
1469-9478)
until 2003
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
Fitness to plead is a fundamental legal concept. Its determination in England and Wales rests on professional interpretation of the 'Pritchard' criteria (1836). In the United States, the determination of the analogous concept of competence to stand trial rests on professional interpretation of the 'Dusky' criteria (1960). Numerous assessment instruments have been developed in North America to help guide professional determinations of competence to stand trial, but such assessments are not routinely employed in British settings. The evidence reviewed calls into question the utility of the fitness to plead construct as currently formulated and highlights the inadequacy of the procedures employed in its determination. We argue that both conceptual and procedural changes are required.
|
| Keywords: fitness to plead and stand trial; adjudicative competence; competence to stand trial; instrument; tool; mental health legislation |
| view references (76) |

Download Citation


CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea