ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Forthcoming Articles       Volume 19 Issue 4       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
<< firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

Fitness to plead and competence to stand trial: a systematic review of the constructs and their application 

Authors: T. P. Rogers a;  N. J. Blackwood ab;  F. Farnham b;  G. J. Pickup c; M. J. Watts bc
Affiliations:   a Department of Forensic Mental Health Science, Kings College London, Institute of Psychiatry, UK
b North London Forensic Service, Barnet, Enfield, and Haringey Mental Health Trust, London, UK
c Sub-Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, UK
DOI: 10.1080/14789940801947909
Publication Frequency: 6 issues per year
Published in: journal Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, Volume 19, Issue 4 December 2008 , pages 576 - 596
Formats available: HTML (English) : PDF (English)
Previously published as: The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry (0958-5184, 1469-9478) until 2003
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions


Abstract

Fitness to plead is a fundamental legal concept. Its determination in England and Wales rests on professional interpretation of the 'Pritchard' criteria (1836). In the United States, the determination of the analogous concept of competence to stand trial rests on professional interpretation of the 'Dusky' criteria (1960). Numerous assessment instruments have been developed in North America to help guide professional determinations of competence to stand trial, but such assessments are not routinely employed in British settings. The evidence reviewed calls into question the utility of the fitness to plead construct as currently formulated and highlights the inadequacy of the procedures employed in its determination. We argue that both conceptual and procedural changes are required.
Keywords: fitness to plead and stand trial; adjudicative competence; competence to stand trial; instrument; tool; mental health legislation
view references (76)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2009 Informa plc