ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Volume 31 Issue 1       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
<< firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

Unpacking the Doubt in “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”: Plausible Alternative Stories Increase Not Guilty Verdicts 

Authors: Elizabeth R. Tenney a;  Hayley M. D. Cleary b; Barbara A. Spellman a
Affiliations:   a University of Virginia,
b Georgetown University,
DOI: 10.1080/01973530802659687
Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year
Published in: journal Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Volume 31, Issue 1 January 2009 , pages 1 - 8
Formats available: HTML (English) : PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions


Abstract

Does introducing alternative suspects diminish belief in a defendant's guilt? Participants read a fictional murder trial transcript. In some conditions, the defense attorney described how one or more other people could have committed the crime. Accusing one alternative suspect dramatically reduced guilty verdicts. However, accusing two or three was not much better than accusing one. Theoretically, the story model and support theory can be interpreted as accounting for these results. Practically, a defense that argues not only that the defendant is innocent but also that some other individual(s) could have committed the crime is more likely to attain an acquittal.
view references (13)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2010 Informa plc