Unpacking the Doubt in “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”: Plausible Alternative Stories Increase Not Guilty Verdicts
Authors:
Elizabeth R. Tenney a;
Hayley M. D. Cleary b;
Barbara A. Spellman a
| Affiliations: | a University of Virginia, |
| b Georgetown University, |
DOI:
10.1080/01973530802659687
Publication Frequency:
4 issues per year
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
Does introducing alternative suspects diminish belief in a defendant's guilt? Participants read a fictional murder trial transcript. In some conditions, the defense attorney described how one or more other people could have committed the crime. Accusing one alternative suspect dramatically reduced guilty verdicts. However, accusing two or three was not much better than accusing one. Theoretically, the story model and support theory can be interpreted as accounting for these results. Practically, a defense that argues not only that the defendant is innocent but also that some other individual(s) could have committed the crime is more likely to attain an acquittal.
|
| view references (13) |

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea