A framework of teaching competencies across the medical education continuum
Authors:
W. M. Molenaara; A. Zantingb; P. van Beukelenc; W. de Graved; J. A. Baanee; J. A. Bustraanf; R. Engbersg; Th. E. Fickh; J. C. G. Jacobsi; J. M. Vervoornj
(Show Biographies)
| Affiliations: | a University Medical Center Groningen, Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
| b Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | |
| c Utrecht University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | |
| d Maastricht University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | |
| e Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | |
| f PLATO/Leiden University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | |
| g Radboud University Hospital Nijmegen, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | |
| h University Medical Center Utrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | |
| i VU Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | |
| j Academic Center for Dentistry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
DOI:
10.1080/01421590902845881
Publication Frequency:
12 issues per year
Subjects:
Allied Health;
Medical Education;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Full Text Article
Abstract
Background: The quality of teachers in higher education is subject of increasing attention, as exemplified by the development and implementation of guidelines for teacher qualifications at Universities in The Netherlands.
Aim: Because medical education takes a special position in higher education the Council of Deans of Medical Schools in The Netherlands installed a national task force to explore a method to weigh criteria for teacher qualifications of medical teachers. Methods: A framework was developed covering competencies of teachers throughout the medical education continuum and including medicine, dentistry and veterinary medicine. Results: The framework distinguishes 3 dimensions: (a) six domains of teaching (development - organization - execution - coaching - assessment - evaluation); (b) three levels in the organization at which teachers perform (micro, meso and macro level) and (c) competencies as integration of knowledge, skills and attitude and described as behaviour in specific context. The current framework is the result of several cycles of descriptions, feedback from the field and adaptations. It is meant as a guideline, leaving room for local detailing. Conclusion: The framework provides a common language that may be used not only by teachers and teacher trainers, but also by quality assurance committees, human resource managers and institutional boards. |
| view references (24) |


Download Citation

CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea