Why Americans fight: Justifications for asymmetric warfare
Author:
Richard E. Rubenstein a
| Affiliation: | a Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, Arlington, VA, USA |
DOI:
10.1080/17467580903159235
Publication Frequency:
3 issues per year
Subjects:
Crime Control - Criminology;
Crime and Society;
Criminological Psychology;
Cross Cultural Psychology;
Cultural Criminology;
Cultural Studies;
Forms of Crime;
Intergroup Behavior;
Policing;
Political & Economic Anthropology;
Political Ideologies;
Political Psychology;
Political Sociology;
Race - Crime and Society;
Religion & Anthropology;
Social & Cultural Anthropology;
Social & Political Theory;
Social Constructionism;
Social Inequality;
Social Psychology;
Terrorism;
Theories of Crime;
War & Conflict Studies;
Full text options: no full text options are available.
Abstract
Popular justifications for war in the USA have long been based on normative values embodied in America's civil religion, including a sacred right of self-defense. Over time, these justificatory rationales have been adapted and expanded to generate public support for asymmetric wars. An early example of this - the First Seminole War - may help us understand subsequent transformations of the doctrine of self-defense in the light of America's later “superpower” status.
|
| Keywords: asymmetric conflict; globalization; political violence |
| view references (85) |

Download Citation

CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea