LATE RESPONSE TO RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY IN PEDIATRIC GLIOBLASTOMA: Report on Two Patients Treated According to HIT-GBM Protocols
Authors:
C. F. Classen ab;
M. Warmuth-Metz c;
K. Papke d;
A. Trotter ae;
J. E. A. Wolff fg;
S. Wagner g
| Affiliations: | a Children's Hospital, Wedau Kliniken, Klinikum Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany |
| b University Children's Hospital, Rostock, Germany | |
c Department of Neuroradiology, University of W rzburg, W rzburg, Germany |
|
| d Clinic of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Wedau Kliniken, Klinikum Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany | |
| e Hegau-Klinikum GmbH, Singen, Germany | |
| f Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Neurooncology Section, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA | |
| g Department of Pediatric Oncology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany |
DOI:
10.1080/08880010600951088
Publication Frequency:
8 issues per year
Subjects:
Oncology: Hematologic Oncology;
Hematology: Hematologic Oncology;
Pediatrics & Child Health;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
High-grade gliomas in children are rare and the best treatment is undetermined. The German language group study HIT-GBM compares various induction protocols for subsequent patient cohorts. Currently, cisplatinum, etoposide, ifosfamide, and vincristine are given simultaneously with extended-field radiotherapy. Imaging is done 3 weeks after to define treatment response, followed by 6-weekly controls during consolidation with lomustine, vincristine, and prednisone. The authors report on 2 patients with incompletely resected glioblastoma multiforme in which response was lacking 3 weeks after radiochemotherapy but became evident 12 weeks later. This suggests that later time points are required to assess induction protocol response.
|
| Keywords: glioblastoma; response control; radiochemotherapy; pediatric |
| view references (7) |


Download Citation
rzburg, W
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea