What missile proliferation means for Europe
Authors:
Anthony Seaboyer - Anthony Seaboyer is a member of the European and Atlantic Security Research Unit at the Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik in Berlin and a doctoral candidate at the University of Greifswald and Queens University. He specialises in the Common European Foreign and Security Policy, nonproliferation, transatlantic relations and Canadian foreign and security policy.; Oliver Thr
nert - Oliver Thr
nert is Head of the European and Atlantic Security Research Unit at the Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik in Berlin. He specialises in nonproliferation, arms control and missile defence.
nert - Oliver Thr
nert is Head of the European and Atlantic Security Research Unit at the Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik in Berlin. He specialises in nonproliferation, arms control and missile defence.
DOI:
10.1080/00396330600765542
Publication Frequency:
6 issues per year
Subjects:
Security Studies - Military & Strategic;
Security Studies - Pol & Intl Relns;
Strategic Studies;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
The missile issue is back, yet the problem has not yet generated the broader public debate necessary to understand what missile proliferation really means for Europe and what instruments should be chosen to deal with it. For Europe, the most important ramification of this proliferation will be to restrain European willingness to intervene militarily beyond the territories of NATO and EU members. With this background, the debate on missile defence is likely to continue on Europe, yet with only a moderate threat perception, tight budgets and other military necessities, missile defences can not be a political priority.
|
| view citations (1) |

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea