Nuclear terrorism: A disheartening dissent
Authors:
Anna M. Pluta - Anna M. Pluta is a researcher in the Centre for Science and Security Studies at King's College London and a doctoral candidate at the London School of Economics.;
Peter D. Zimmerman - Peter D. Zimmerman, a nuclear physicist, is Chair of Science and Security in the Department of War Studies and Director of the Centre for Science and Security Studies at King's College London. He headed the technical working group which prepared the nuclear sections of the 1998 edition of the Militarily Critical Technologies List.
DOI:
10.1080/00396330600765583
Publication Frequency:
6 issues per year
Subjects:
Security Studies - Military & Strategic;
Security Studies - Pol & Intl Relns;
Strategic Studies;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
Since the early 1990s, the maximum violence in acts of international terrorism has steadily increased. It is on the basis of this trajectory - and because of al-Qaeda's stated aims to acquire and use a so-called 'weapon of mass destruction' - that many analysts have concluded that a nuclear terror attack is likely only a matter of time. Others argue that this is alarmism, but the fissile material is available, or could become available, from a Russian nuclear stockpile that remains dangerously insecure. An improvised nuclear device would be difficult, but not too difficult, to build. And there are terrorist groups that have already demonstrated the technical abilities and organisational reach to make us very worried.
|
| view citations (1) |

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea