Diagnostic ultrasound of the shoulder—a method for experts only?
Results from an orthopedic surgeon with relative inexperience compared to operative findings
Authors:
Stefan Moosmayer a;
Hans-j
rgen Smith b
rgen Smith b
| Affiliations: | a Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martina Hansen's Hospital, B rum |
| b Departments of Radiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway |
DOI:
10.1080/17453670510041484
Publication Frequency:
6 issues per year
Subject:
Orthopedics;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
You have:
FREE ACCESS
Previously published as:
Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
(0001-6470,
1651-1964)
until 2005
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
Background Diagnostic ultrasound examination of the shoulder is generally considered to require long experience. We examined the results of an orthopedic surgeon with little experience of ultrasound.
Patients and methods A relatively inexperienced examiner performed preoperative ultrasound scanning of 79 patients with symptoms from the rotator cuff and/or the long head of the biceps muscle. Tears of the rotator cuff and rupture or dislocation of the long head of the biceps muscle were the positive findings of interest. Results were compared to operative findings. Results In 66 of 79 shoulders, ultrasonographic rotator cuff findings were confirmed at surgery (accuracy 84%). 20 of 26 full-thickness tears were diagnosed correctly. 6 of 7 partial-thickness tears were overlooked. Ultrasound was false positive in 1 case. For the long head of the biceps muscle, all 8 cases of dislocation or rupture of the tendon were diagnosed but differentiation between the two conditions was not possible in 2 cases. Interpretation Our results may encourage orthopedic surgeons to start using ultrasound as a diagnostic technique for full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff and for pathology in the long head of the biceps muscle. |
| view references (14) |


Download Citation

rum
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea