ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Volume 27 Issue 5       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
<< firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

Fertilizer Concentration and Irrigation Method Affect Growth and Fruiting of Ornamental Pepper 

Authors: Jong-Goo Kang a;  Marc W. van Iersel b; Krishna S. Nemali b
Affiliations:   a Department of Horticulture, Sunchon National University, Sunchon, Chonnam, South Korea
b Department of Horticulture, Plant Science Building, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
DOI: 10.1081/PLN-120030676
Publication Frequency: 14 issues per year
Published in: journal Journal of Plant Nutrition, Volume 27, Issue 5 December 2004 , pages 867 - 884
Formats available: HTML (English) : PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions


Abstract

To evaluate the effects of fertilizer concentration and irrigation method on growth of ornamental pepper (Capsicum annuum L. “Treasures Red”), a water-soluble fertilizer solution containing 0, 100, 200, 300, or 400 mg L-1 nitrogen (N) was applied, using subirrigation and hand-watering. Fertilizer concentrations of 200-400 mg L-1 N resulted in an electrical conductivity (EC) gradient from the bottom (lowest EC) to the top (highest EC) of the growing medium in subirrigated, but not in hand-watered pots. The EC in the bottom layer of the medium was affected by irrigation method only at a fertilizer concentration of 400 mg L-1 N. The pH of the growing medium decreased with increasing fertilizer concentration. Shoot dry mass was highest at 200 mg L-1 N in both irrigation treatments and was consistently higher with hand-watering than with subirrigation. Leaf area also was highest at 200 mg L-1 N, but was not affected by irrigation method. In contrast, plant height was greater with subirrigation than with hand-watering, and also peaked at 200 mg L-1 N. Hand-watering increased stem diameter compared to subirrigation and was maximal with 200-400 mg L-1 N. Chlorophyll content of the leaves was much lower at 0 than at 100-400 mg L-1 N, and not affected by irrigation method. Fruit fresh mass was higher with hand-watering than with subirrigation, but shoot dry mass was not affected by irrigation method. Fruiting was poor at 0 mg L-1 N, but did not vary much among fertilizer concentrations ranging from 100-400 mg L-1 N. Subirrigation resulted in earlier flowering and fruit ripening than hand-watering, suggesting that the production period may be a few days shorter with subirrigation. Although N, iron (Fe), and molybdenum (Mo) all increased with increasing fertilizer concentrations, N most likely limited growth at low fertilizer concentrations. In contrast to previous research, these results do not indicate that subirrigated plants should be fertilized with lower concentrations than hand-watered plants.
Keywords: Capsicum annuum; Electrical conductivity; Nitrogen; Subirrigation; Substrate pH
view references (19)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2010 Informa plc