Evolutionary theories of rape
Authors:
John Archer; A. Elaine Vaughan
DOI:
10.1080/14616660110049609
Publication Frequency:
3 issues per year
Subjects:
Evolutionary Psychology;
Sexuality;
Number of References: 26
Formats available:
PDF
(English)
Previously published as:
Psychology, Evolution & Gender
(1461-6661,
1470-1073)
until 2003
The circumstances under which this title is published have changed:
Reason for change: closed
Date of change: 2006
New ISSN: 1479-2508
New EISSN: 1479-2516
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
Abstract
There are several evolutionary views of rape, each of which leads to different predictions. Rape can be viewed as itself adaptive or the by-product of other characteristics that are. If adaptive, it can be regarded as conditional in that it either applies only to certain individuals, or to certain circumstances. Evolutionary views of rape are often criticized because they are viewed as being counter to the feminist position that rape is motivated by power. Although this criticism often confuses ultimate and proximate explanations, there is one division between the evolutionary and feminist positions that cannot be bridged, its ultimate origin. Animal behaviour research indicates that forced copulations do occur widely in the natural world, and therefore predate the patriarchal power that is the presumed origin of rape in feminist theories.
|
| Keywords: Rape; Evolution; Feminism; Reproductive Strategies |
| view references (26) : view citations |

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea