Immunization with the binding domain of FimH, the adhesin of type 1 fimbriae, does not protect chickens against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli
Authors:
Fr
deric Vandemaele a;
Cedric Ververken a;
Nele Bleyen a;
Jorina Geys a;
Charlotte D'Hulst a;
Tarek Addwebi a;
Paul van Empel b;
Bruno Maria Goddeeris ac
deric Vandemaele a;
Cedric Ververken a;
Nele Bleyen a;
Jorina Geys a;
Charlotte D'Hulst a;
Tarek Addwebi a;
Paul van Empel b;
Bruno Maria Goddeeris ac
| Affiliations: | a Laboratory of Physiology and Immunology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Applied Bioscience and Engineering, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium |
| b Bacteriological R&D, Intervet International, Boxmeer, The Netherlands | |
| c Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ghent, Merelbeke, Belgium |
DOI:
10.1080/03079450500112682
Publication Frequency:
6 issues per year
Subjects:
Agriculture & Environmental Sciences;
Virology;
Number of References: 32
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
You have:
FREE ACCESS
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
in English
View Article (HTML)
in English
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether vaccination with the sugar-binding domain of FimH (FimH156) was able to protect chickens against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). FimH156 was expressed and purified using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. Binding of FimH156 to mannosylated bovine serum albumin demonstrated that the protein retained its biological activity. Moreover, anti-FimH156 antisera were able to inhibit in vitro binding of E. coli to mannosylated bovine serum albumin. In a first vaccination experiment, FimH156 was administered intramuscularly as a water-in-oil emulsion to specific pathogen free broiler chicks. A predisposing infection with the Newcastle disease virus strain Lasota was administered 3 weeks later, followed 3 days later by an aerosol challenge with the virulent APEC strain CH2. A good anti-FimH156 immunoglobulin (Ig)G immune response was detected in serum, but no protective effects of FimH156 against APEC were seen. In a second experiment, SPF chicks were vaccinated intramuscularly or intranasally with FimH156. Booster vaccinations were administered 20 days later. While the intramuscular immunization yielded a strong IgG response in the serum and trachea, no significant IgA response could be detected in tracheal washes. Intranasal immunization did not yield a significant IgG or IgA response in serum and trachea. No protective effects of the FimH156 could be detected, confirming the results of the first experiment. Thus, although the FimH156 induced a strong immune response, it was unable to protect chickens against APEC.
|
| view references (32) : view citations |

Download Citation


ol
ais
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea