Evaluating the Oversight of Scientific Misconduct
Authors:
Barbara K. Redman a;
Jon F. Merz b
| Affiliations: | a Department of Medical Ethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA and Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan |
| b Department of Medical Ethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA |
DOI:
10.1080/08989620500216281
Publication Frequency:
6 issues per year
Subject:
General Science;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
The office of Research Integrity has proposed a new definition of scientific misconduct that will substantively reduce the federal government's role of oversight of scientific practices. The standard is being changed despite the lack of evidence about the effects of current policies or understanding of why research misconduct occurs, how it can be detected and prevented, and the nature and effectiveness of sanctions. Given this lack of knowledge and the perception that the integrity of science is falling, we believe it would be unwise for the academic and scientific community to adopt this new standard.
|
| Keywords: scientific; misconduct; oversight; research; integrity; federal |
| view references (16) |

Download Citation

CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea