ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Volume 12 Issue 3       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
<< firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal
iOpen

Evaluating the Oversight of Scientific Misconduct 

Authors: Barbara K. Redman a; Jon F. Merz b
Affiliations:   a Department of Medical Ethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA and Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
b Department of Medical Ethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
DOI: 10.1080/08989620500216281
Publication Frequency: 6 issues per year
Published in: journal Accountability in Research, Volume 12, Issue 3 July 2005 , pages 157 - 162
Subject: General Science;
Formats available: HTML (English) : PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions


Abstract

The office of Research Integrity has proposed a new definition of scientific misconduct that will substantively reduce the federal government's role of oversight of scientific practices. The standard is being changed despite the lack of evidence about the effects of current policies or understanding of why research misconduct occurs, how it can be detected and prevented, and the nature and effectiveness of sanctions. Given this lack of knowledge and the perception that the integrity of science is falling, we believe it would be unwise for the academic and scientific community to adopt this new standard.
Keywords: scientific; misconduct; oversight; research; integrity; federal
view references (16)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2010 Informa plc