A comparison of the effect of different types of clam rakes on non-target, subtidal benthic fauna
Authors:
Cristina Munari a;
Emanuela Balasso a;
Remigio Rossi a;
Michele Mistri a
| Affiliation: | a Dipartimento di Biologia, Universit di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy |
DOI:
10.1080/11250000500502152
Publication Frequency:
4 issues per year
Subjects:
Agriculture & Environmental Sciences;
Animal Behaviour;
Animal Biochemistry;
Animal Ecology;
Animal Physiology;
Animal Taxonomy;
Behavioral Sciences;
Bioscience;
Developmental Biology;
Entomology & Acarology;
Ethology;
Genetics;
Plant & Animal Ecology;
Reproduction;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
Previously published as:
Bolletino di zoologia
(0373-4137)
until 1995
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
The impact on the macrobenthic community of different types of rake, manual rake (MR), hydraulic rake (HR), and conveyor rake (CR), was studied on subtidal flats in the Sacca di Goro. Two sets of experiments, on sandy and muddy bottoms, were undertaken in summer 2004: the experimental protocol required that six parallel waylines for both MR and HR were raked by a shellfish farmer; areas between parallel waylines were considered as controls. Due to operative constraints, the impact of CR was assessed on an 800-m distant, deeper sand flat. Sampling design followed a two-way ANOVA layout with treatments and time as factors. Changes in the benthic community were apparent in the raked plots immediately after treatments, but recolonization by small infaunal species was relatively rapid. While the effects of MR and HR were comparable, CR had a greater deleterious effect on the macrofaunal community. In order to discourage the use of CR, clam fishermen should be allowed to equip their boats with HR gears identical to that used in this study.
|
| Keywords: Clam rake; fishing impact; benthic community; recovery rate |
| view references (38) |

Download Citation

di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea