The potential role of microzooplankton in a northwestern Australian pelagic food web *
Authors:
C. M. Moritz;
D. Montagnes a;
J. H. Carleton b;
D. Wilson a;
A. D. McKinnon b
| Affiliations: | a School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK |
| b Australian Institute of Marine Science, Queensland, Townsville M.C, Australia |
DOI:
10.1080/17451000500497159
Publication Frequency:
6 issues per year
Subjects:
Agriculture & Environmental Sciences;
Marine & Aquatic Science;
Marine Biology;
Marine Science;
Oceanography;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
Also incorporating: Sarsia
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
The role of microzooplankton in waters adjacent to Australia's North West Cape (21°49'S 114°14'E) was studied during the austral summers 1997/1998 and 1998/1999. We estimated microzooplankton abundance and biomass at a shallow (∼20 m) shelf station and at a shelf break station (∼80 m). Microzooplankton were placed into six categories: four ciliate groups (strombidiids, strobilidiids, tintinnids, “other ciliates”), dinoflagellates, and sarcodines. Total microzooplankton abundances ranged between 0.14
103 l-1 and 3.4 103 l-1. The most abundant groups were the dinoflagellates (mean 459±73 standard error l-1) and strombidiids (mean 334±42 standard error l-1). Total microzooplankton biomass ranged between 0.03 and 1.70 µg C l-1 (mean 0.33±0.05 standard error l-1). Redundancy analysis indicated differences in microzooplankton community composition between stations and sampling years but no differences with sampling depth. The microzooplankton community showed considerable variability between adjacent sampling dates, reinforcing the conclusion of earlier studies that this area is a dynamic environment. Ciliate production on the shelf was estimated to be 1.05 µg C l-1day-1 (∼20 mg C m-2 day-1) and 0.79 µg C l-1 day-1(∼70 mg C m-2 day-1) at the shelf break. Ciliate production near North West Cape was two- to six-fold higher than the rate of secondary production by juvenile copepods. Despite this, ciliate grazing appears to account for only ∼5% of primary production and ciliates do not appear to be a major conduit between primary producers and higher trophic levels in these waters.
|
|
*
Published in collaboration with the University of Bergen and the Institute of Marine Research, Norway, and the Marine Biological Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
|
| Keywords: Abundance; biomass; community composition; gazing impact; production |
| view references (36) |

Download Citation

103 l-1 and 3.4
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea