The end of biomilitary realism? Rethinking biomedicine and international security
Author:
Neil Arya a
(Show Biography)
| Affiliation: | a Physicians for Global Survival, Ottawa |
DOI:
10.1080/13623690600772576
Publication Frequency:
4 issues per year
Subjects:
War & Conflict Studies;
World Military History;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
Previously published as:
Journal of the Medical Association for Prevention of War
(0265-2196)
until 1985
Previously published as:
Medicine and War
(0748-8009)
until 1996
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
Medicine and politics have a common aim, the welfare of people, and the ideas and language of one influence the other. There are parallels between medicine, particularly its more cutting-edge aspects, and international affairs; and the more aggressive forms of medicine, like the more aggressive forms of international relationships, seem to be about short-term gain, based on little evidence, with longer-term negative consequences as the full impact of the action becomes clear. Modern medicine has been very effective in curative methods, but the fundamentals of public health, which receive less kudos, have perhaps had more beneficial effects. The world of international affairs can learn much from a holistic and public health approach.
|
| Keywords: Abuse of science; Evidence-based medicine; International affairs; Realism |
| view references (14) : view citations |

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea