ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Volume 15 Issue 1       Subscribe       Article       References       Cited By       Related articles      
firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

Participation in free-time activities: a comparison of London and New York 

Authors: Janet E. Stockdale a;  Andrew J. Wells a; Marilyn Rall b
Affiliations:   a Department of Social Psychology, London School of Economics, USA
b Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, USA
DOI: 10.1080/02614369600390221
Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year
Published in: journal Leisure Studies, Volume 15, Issue 1 January 1996 , pages 1 - 16
Formats available: PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions
View Article: View Article (PDF) View Article (PDF)


Abstract

A quota sample of 336 London residents was interviewed using a questionnaire designed to provide information about the respondents' leisure participation patterns and their personal and social characteristics. A comparison study was carried out with a sample of 414 residents from Brooklyn, New York. In both samples there were clearly identifiable groups of leisure activities and it was possible to describe the profile of participants in each group. The results for both London and New York indicate that leisure participation is related to individuals' gender and working status, their socioeconomic class and their family commitments. Comparisons of the activity groupings and their participant profiles across the two samples indicated that there were five sets of leisure participation choices which were common to both London and New York. The implications of these findings for the generalizability of leisure constructs are assessed.
view references (53) : view citations
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2009 Informa plc