A short communication course for physicians improves the quality of patient information in a clinical trial
Authors:
P
ivi S. Hietanen a;
Arja R. Aro b;
Kaija A. Holli c;
Marjut Schreck d;
Anni Peura e;
Heikki T. Joensuu f
ivi S. Hietanen a;
Arja R. Aro b;
Kaija A. Holli c;
Marjut Schreck d;
Anni Peura e;
Heikki T. Joensuu f
| Affiliations: | a Finnish Medical Journal, Helsinki, Finland |
| b Unit for Health Promotion Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark | |
| c Medical School, Tampere University, Finland | |
| d National Public Health Institute, Finland | |
| e Research and Development Unit for Medical Education, University of Helsinki, Finland | |
| f Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Helsinki, Finland |
DOI:
10.1080/02841860600849067
Publication Frequency:
8 issues per year
Subject:
Oncology;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
You have:
FREE ACCESS
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
We investigated whether a short course in communication skills for physicians would improve the quality of informed consent in a randomized clinical adjuvant trial on breast cancer. In this prospective, case-controlled intervention study, physicians and research nurses who introduced the cancer treatment trial to patients at three of the participating hospitals first attended a one-day communication skills course. The quality of informed consent was then evaluated by addressing a standardized questionnaire, QuIC, to trial patients at the three intervention hospitals and at control hospitals. Response rate was 90.0% (n =288). Of the patients treated by the intervention group, 73% were very satisfied with the information received compared with 56% of those of the control group (p = 0.003). The patients of the intervention group considered the time given for making their decision sufficient more often than those of the controls (98% vs. 90%, p=0.004). The patients of the intervention group recalled more often than those of the controls that the physician had also offered other therapeutic options than the trial treatment (91% vs. 97%, p=0.032). They also understood the main aim of the study better than the patients of the controls (89% vs. 78%, p=0.030). In conclusion, a short communication skills course for the trial physicians and nurses improved the quality of informed consent and patient satisfaction in the trial.
|
| view references (29) : view citations |


Download Citation

CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea