ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Forthcoming Articles       Volume 17 Issue 3       Subscribe       Article       References       Related articles      
<< firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

Trading foreign exchange portfolios with volatility filters: the carry model revisited 

Authors: Christian L. Dunis a; Jia Miao b
Affiliations:   a Liverpool John Moores University and CIBEF (Centre for International Banking, Economics and Finance), Liverpool L3 5UZ, UK
b School of Accounting and Finance, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M13GH, UK
DOI: 10.1080/09603100500447578
Publication Frequency: 21 issues per year
Published in: journal Applied Financial Economics, Volume 17, Issue 3 February 2007 , pages 249 - 255
Formats available: HTML (English) : PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions


Abstract

The rejection of the simple risk-neutral efficient market hypothesis in the foreign exchange (FX) market opens the possibility of the profitable use of a carry model taking full advantage of interest rate differentials to trade currencies. A first motivation for this paper is to study whether a simple passive carry model can outperform a typical currency fund manager replicated by dynamic technical moving average convergence and divergence (MACD) models as in Lequeux and Acar (1998). Secondly, we study whether the addition of volatility filters can further improve the carry model performance. We consider the period starting from the introduction of the Euro (EUR) on 4 January 1999 to 31 March 2005 (1620 datapoints). To assess the consistency of the carry model performance on a portfolio of the nine most heavily traded exchange rates, the whole review period is further split into two sub-periods. Our results show that in the three periods considered and after inclusion of transaction costs, the simple carry model performs much better than the benchmark MACD model in terms of annualized return, risk-adjusted return and maximum potential loss, while a combined carry/MACD model has the lowest trading volatility. Moreover, the addition of two volatility filters adds significant value to the performance of the three models studied.
view references (19)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2009 Informa plc