ebooks logo journals logo reference works logo abstract databases logo
bullet  SIGN IN Register | Why Register? | Got a Voucher? alerts   marked lists   shopping cart 

informaworld

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   BROWSE
    Issues List       Latest Issue       Volume 2 Issue 2       Subscribe       Article       Cited By       Related articles      
firstfirst   < prevprev   Table of contentstoc   next >next   last >>last
Publisher Logo Publication Cover
Search within this journal

Computer Forensics—What Is It Good For? 

Author: Ronald E. Kaplan a
Affiliation:   a System Integration Consultants, Los Angeles, CA, USA
DOI: 10.1080/15567280801958464
Publication Frequency: 4 issues per year
Published in: journal Journal of Digital Forensic Practice, Volume 2, Issue 2 April 2008 , pages 57 - 61
Formats available: HTML (English) : PDF (English)
Article Requests: Order Reprints : Request Permissions


Abstract

Computer forensic examiners need to combine art and science to produce the highest valued electronic data content. The wide variety of document types, tremendous volume of dissimilar media, operating systems, programs, and compaction and encryption algorithms all present daunting tasks for the examiner to efficiently organize, process, and filter. The art involves how to get to the core documents, the smoking gun. Individual disk drives, in and of themselves, are very large reservoirs of information. The investigator's job is to assist counsel in establishing priorities for searching drives, directories, and document types. This is where the experience of the examiner and the art of forensic examinations come in. The science involves the tools that capture, sort, and select the data for review by counsel. Further, there exists a wealth of knowledge about how computers operate and where programs and operating systems store data or encode information about where and when information was placed on a computer's hard drive. Experts who excel at combining the science with the art are the ones who are most helpful in assisting counsel making arguments that win court decisions.
Keywords: expert testimony; computer forensics; spoliation; evidence
view citations (1)
Bookmark with:
  • CiteULike
  • Del.icio.us
  • BibSonomy
  • Connotea
  • More bookmarks
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Accessibility | RSS
FAQs in: English . Français . Español . 中文(简体和繁體)
© 2009 Informa plc