immediate access to the latest key research articles
Three decades of lay epistemics: The why, how, and who of knowledge formation
Authors:
Arie W. Kruglanski a;
Mark Dechesne a;
Edward Orehek a;
Antonio Pierro b
| Affiliations: | a University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA |
| b University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy |
DOI:
10.1080/10463280902860037
First Published on:
20 November 2009
Subject:
Social Psychology;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
A conceptual integration and review are presented of three separate research programmes informed by the theory of lay epistemics (Kruglanski, 1989). They respectively address the “why”, “how”, and “who” questions about human knowledge formation. The “why” question is treated in work on the need for cognitive closure that propels epistemic behaviour and affects individual, interpersonal, and group phenomena. The “how” question is addressed in work on the unimodel (Kruglanski, Pierro, Mannetti, Erb, & Chun, 2007) depicting the process of drawing conclusions from the “information given”. The “who” question is addressed in work on “epistemic authority” highlighting the centrality of source effects (including oneself as a source) in human epistemic behaviour. These separate research paradigms explore facets of epistemic behaviour that jointly produce human knowledge, of essential significance to people's' individual and social functioning.
|
| Keywords: Need for closure; Unimodel; Epistemic authority; Rule following; Seizing |
| view references (133) |

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea