Childhood cancers near German nuclear power stations: the ongoing debate
Author:
Ian Fairlie
DOI:
10.1080/13623690902943388
Publication Frequency:
4 issues per year
Subjects:
War & Conflict Studies;
World Military History;
Formats available:
HTML
(English)
:
PDF
(English)
You have:
FREE ACCESS
Previously published as:
Journal of the Medical Association for Prevention of War
(0265-2196)
until 1985
Previously published as:
Medicine and War
(0748-8009)
until 1996
View Article:
View Article (PDF)
View Article (HTML)
Abstract
In late 2007, the significant KiKK study (Kinderkrebs in der Umgebung von KernKraftwerken = Childhood Cancer in the Vicinity of Nuclear Power Plants) in Germany reported a 1.6-fold increase in all cancers and a 2.2-fold increase in leukaemias, among children living within 5 km of all German nuclear power stations. The KiKK study by Kaatsch et al. was extensively described in a recent edition of Medicine Conflict and Survival. It has triggered much discussion as to the cause(s) of these increased cancers. This article reports on recent developments on the KiKK study, including responses by German radiation agencies, and recent epidemiological studies near United Kingdom and French nuclear installations. It reflects the current debate and concludes with advice to policy-makers on radiation risks on the relative merits of the KiKK study. An accompanying article outlines a possible explanation for the increased cancers and makes recommendations for future research.
|
| Keywords: cancer; carbon-14; congenital malformations; discharges; embryo; emissions; foetus; leukaemia; nuclear power stations; radiation; radioactivity; radionuclides; relative risk; tritium; untoward pregnancy outcomes |
| view references (22) |

Download Citation
CiteULike
Del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Connotea