Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal on obstetrics and gynecology and related matters concerning reproductive health. A manuscript will be considered on the understanding that it has been submitted exclusively to Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, that the material presented has not been published before and is not under any simultaneous consideration elsewhere. Priority is given to articles containing original and innovative research data with a clinical emphasis and to articles or reviews using a systematic and evidence-based approach.
For first time users, start by creating a new account, and then follow the instructions provided. For existing users, log into your account and then enter your 'Corresponding Author Center'. For additional assistance, contact the Editorial Office via e-mail at: acta.obstet.gynecol@obgyn.gu.se.
Manuscript Design Manuscripts should be arranged according to rules stated in the “Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals”; see also: Ann Intern Med 1997;126:36-47, or JAMA 1997;277:927-34. The full document is available at
www.icmje.org. The journal specific requirements are detailed below.
Manuscripts should be structured as follows: 1) Title page, 2) Abstract, 3) Keywords, 4) Main text, including; a) Introduction, b) Material and Methods, c) Results and Discussion; 5) Acknowledgments, Disclosure of Interest; 6) References, 7) Legends of Figures and Tables, 8) Tables and/or Figures.
1. Title page - should include: a) Full title (avoid abbreviations or proprietary names in the title) b) Running title (for page heading, max 40 characters), c) All contributing authors with full name, title and affiliation, d) Corresponding author details (to whom all decision letters and page proofs will be communicated, and to be noted in the printed manuscript).
2. Abstract - A structured abstract of no more than 250 words is required for main research articles, subdivided into the following sequential sections: Objective, Design, Setting, Population or Sample, Methods, Main Outcome Measures, Results, Conclusions. Short Reports, non-systematic reviews, commentaries and case reports require a maximum 150-word “block” style, non-structured abstract.
3. Keywords - Include in the manuscript file 3-5 keywords representative of your article. These may be used for indexing services and other search facilities for published material.
4. Main text - The text for articles and short communications should be structured with the following headings: Introduction, Material and Methods (including statistics, ethics and consent issues), Results and Discussion (bold, lower case). Commentaries and Reviews should have headings appropriate for the article.
5. Acknowledgements - Include only those who have made a valuable contribution to the work presented but who do not qualify as authors, with their contribution described. This may include a patient population and funding bodies. Use plain language and avoid adjectives. If appropriate, funding for publication, for writing or editorial assistance may be added.
6. Disclosure of interests (see details below).
7. References - in Vancouver style (see details below).
8. Figure and Table legends - Clearly marked with the heading of each table/figure.
9. Tables - Can be included in the main document if created with the table tool in the word processing software. The number of tables and figures should be kept to a minimum. There should preferably not be repetition/overlap of information given in tables/figures/text.
10. Figures - should be submitted as separate files in the best possible quality. Read more about accepted formats and quality requirements below.
A Cover Letter should be provided, where authors vouch for the accuracy of the manuscript according to the guidelines given here. This is also the place where authors may inform the Editors of any special circumstances or details regarding the submitted material, including prior publication of the material/parts of the material in a minority language.
Read more about article types accepted below.
References
The 'Vancouver style' of references must be applied. No more than 30 references are accepted as a general rule for Original Articles and 12 for Short Reports. Exceptions to this can be made if the reason is noted in the author(s) Cover Letter. State the references consecutively in the order in which they are first mentioned in the text, using Arabic numerals within parentheses. References cited only in tables or in legends to figures should be numbered in accordance with the sequence established by the first identification in the text of the particular table or figure. List all authors when six or fewer, when seven or more, list the first six and add 'et al'.
Abbreviations of journal titles: please consult the List of Journals Indexed in Index Medicus, published annually as a list in the January issue of Index Medicus - for more information: www.nlm.nih.gov
Examples of the most commonly used reference types:
Standard journal article
1. Andersson S, Mints M. Thermal balloon ablation for the treatment of menorrhagia in an outpatient setting. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:480-83.
2. Benedetto C, Marozio L, Ciccone G, Chieppa G, Quaglia M, Matullo G et al. Synergistic effect of renin-angiotensin system and nitric oxide synthase genes polymorphisms in pre-eclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:678-82.
If the language is not English, add the translated title in brackets, e.g. 3. Janson PO, Friden B. Du sk

na nya v

rld. M

nskliga embryon genom kloning: Vad

r m

jligt och vad

r

nskv

rt? [Brave New World". Human embryo cloning: what is possible and what is eligible?] (in Swedish. No abstract available.) Lakartidningen. 2004;101:760-3.
Book 4. B

K, Berghmans B, M

rkved S, Van Kampen M (eds.). Evidence-based physical therapy for the pelvic floor. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2007.
Chapter in book
5. Geirsson RT. Midpregnancy problems. In: James DK, Weiner CP, Steer PJ, Gonik B (eds). High Risk pregnancy. 3rd edn. Philadelphia PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2006. pp. 125-37.
For more examples of how to refer to different sources, consult the uniform requirements for biomedical journals online: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requirements.html
Figures
Graphic elements and illustrations are accepted if providing unique data that can not be described in the text, and should be clearly marked with Arabic numbers as they appear in the text. To ensure correct placement in the journal layout, note the figure reference (abbreviated) within brackets when referring to the figure in text, e.g. (Fig. 1).
Figure files should be kept as separate files, in TIF, EPS, PDF or JPG format. Providing these formats will guarantee that the quality of the graphics is good throughout the publishing process, if provided with sufficient resolution. Photographic illustrations should be rendered with at least 300 DPI; please use CMYK color conversion if possible. Graphs made with Office software such as Microsoft Excel, can be provided in their original format to facilitate conversion into printable format with preserved quality. Any other line graphs/illustrations should preferably be provided in EPS format with a resolution of at least 600 DPI to prevent ragged lines when printed.
Costs for color illustrations must be borne by the authors. The standard fee is USD 1000 for the first printed colour page, and USD 500 for each subsequent page. Please state in your submission details in Manuscript Central the figures required to be reproduced in colour, noted by their number in the text.
More Style Details
Manuscript Style
The text should be double-spaced with generous margins. Times New Roman in 12 pt size is the preferred font style. Smaller spacing and font may be used for references, tables and figure legends.
The main text part of the manuscript should preferably not exceed 4,000 words (for more information about article lengths, see notes per specific article types below). If an especially long text is necessary, authors are asked to explain the reason for this in their Cover Letter.
Subheadings may be used for clarification in the Material and Methods and Results sections, and must clearly differentiate from the main text using appropriate font style.
Language
Manuscripts should be written in clear and concise scientific English. American spelling should be used throughout.
It is the responsibility of authors to ensure the quality of the language for submitted articles. Colloquial English may not be sufficient and is not necessarily the same as scientific English, for which professional services may be needed (see for example www.internationalscienceediting.com and www.writescienceright.com). A brief language overview will be made for articles accepted for publication, but no major changes are accepted at this stage.
Please note that “fetus/fetal” should be spelled without ”o”, e is used instead of ae or oe (gynecology instead of gynaecology, cesarean instead of caesarean and estrogen instead of oestrogen). Numbers one to nine should be spelled out; for ten or more people, objects, days, months etc. use Arabic numerals. “Women” is generally preferred to “patients” where possible and where disease is not the issue in question.
Supplementary Material
The space available in the printed journal is restricted and authors are therefore encouraged to consider having supplementary material for publication only in the online version of the journal. Supplementary material must be important ancillary information that is relevant to the parent article but is not essential in the printed journal. All supplementary material must be referred to in the manuscript and labelled S1, S2, S3 etc. Do not include supplementary material within the main manuscript file, but upload as separate file(s). Research protocols, movie files and questionnaires are examples of material that might be considered as supplemental and worth publishing in this manner.
Design and Method
The design of investigations, methods of analysis and the source of data should be described in sufficient detail to permit the study to be repeated by others and must include specification of all statistical methods. Authors are asked to detail in the text, tables or figure legends which statistical test was used where and supply test statistics (t- or chi-squared values and degrees of freedom) along with p-values or odds ratios and 95% confidence limits are preferred as measures of uncertainity.
Abbreviations
Measurements should be expressed in SI units with the exception of blood pressure (mmHg). Authors reporting results from a questionnaire survey should include a copy of the questionnaire used together with the manuscript (see supplementary material above).
Any abbreviations or acronyms used should be listed on a separate page after the abstract and defined at first use in the main body of the article. Use only widely accepted and conventional abbreviations. Generic names of drugs should be used unless a proprietary name is directly relevant. Any specialised equipment, chemical or pharmaceutical product cited in the text must be accompanied by the name, city and country of its manufacturer.
Ethics and Consent When reporting experiments on human subjects, indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible local or national committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration (1975, revised 1983) (World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki:
http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.html). Standards for the editorial process are in accordance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (www.publicationethics.org.uk/guidelines/code)
Identifying information should not be published in written declarations, photographs or pedigrees. Do not reveal patients' names, initials or hospital numbers, for example in illustrative material. Photographs of human subjects must be accompanied by informed consent of the person(s) concerned and requires that the person should see the manuscript before publication. Facial features must be unrecognisable.
The Editorial Office may request the authors to supply a pdf copy (or paper copy) of an ethical committee approval for articles describing animal experiments or clinical studies/trials (patients, patient material, medical records), including a verified and official translation of such documents. State in the ethics section that the procedures of the study received ethics approval from the relevant and named national, regional or institutional ethics/review committee(s) responsible for human/animal experimentation. Supply the date of issue and registration number. If no ethics approval was received, explain why, including an explanation as to how the study adhered to the Helsinki Declaration. If deemed necessary by the Editors, cases will be submitted to COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).
Disclosure of Interests
Authors are responsible for recognising and disclosing financial and other conflicts of interest that might affect their work. State relevant financial (e.g. patent or stock ownership, consultancies, speaker's fees), personal, political, intellectual or religious interests. Funding for any type of publication, for example by a commercial company, charity or government department, should be stated. This applies to all types of papers (including, for example, research papers, review papers, letters, editorials and commentaries). A conflict of interest should not prevent someone from being listed as an author if they qualify for authorship.
Contribution to Authorship
A paragraph in the Cover letter explaining each author's contribution is required. To qualify for authorship an individual should meet the following criteria: (a) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or to analysis and interpretation of data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and (c) final approval of the version to be published. Authors should meet conditions (a), (b), and (c). Contributors who do not qualify for authorship should be included in the Acknowledgments section.
To find more useful author resources, please turn to the publisher's Author Area online: /authors_journals
Peer review
The Chief Editor and/or Editorial Board members will screen and decide on suitability of submitted manuscripts with reference to the main aims of the journal. A manuscript may be declined/rejected before a peer-review process, if deemed out of scope or if it does not meet general standards of the journal. This may include reasons such as lack of scientific originality and poor design or execution. All other articles will be subject to peer-review by the Chief Editor, the Editorial Board and selected experts within each field of expertise. This will ensure the quality and importance of published research. Usually, two reviewers will be invited to evaluate each manuscript and the responsible Editor will take their comments under consideration when making a final decision. The review process is single-blinded, which means that the reviewers know the identity of the authors, but the authors will not know the identity of the reviewers. Letters to the Editor are not peer-reviewed but subject to the Editorś approval. Manuscript handling times will be kept as short as possible.
Author proofs - final approval
Authors will be notified via e-mail when a manuscript is ready for final approval before publication. This e-mail provides instructions on how to log on to the online author service, where the final version of the manuscript can be downloaded as a printer ready PDF file.
To avoid delays of publication, proofs should be checked immediately and returned electronically through the online service, following the instructions given. Corrections submitted via the telephone are not accepted. Authors are advised that they are responsible for proof-reading of the text, references, tables and figures for absolute accuracy. Additional material or major corrections cannot be accepted at this stage, nor is substantial rewriting of paragraphs permitted. Such extensive changes may result in a delay or withdrawal of the article from publication. Any costs arising from major additional changes may also be charged to the authors.
Copyright
It is a condition of publication that authors assign copyright or license the publication rights of the contents of their articles, including abstracts, to Informa Healthcare. This enables full copyright protection and dissemination of the article and the Journal, to the widest possible readership in electronic and print formats. A document to verify this will be sent upon acceptance for publication. This document should be signed by the corresponding author and returned to the publisher for archiving. To read more about Informa Healthcare's policy and guidelines regarding copyright, consult the online author service pages:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/authors_journals_copyright
Types of articles
Please note the general editorial policy described in the Main Aims above.
Reviews and commentaries are in general solicited by the Editorial Board, but prospective authors may contact the Editorial Board or Editorial Office with suggestions for such contributions. Short Reports on clinical studies, advances in technology or other relevant reproductive health matters are welcomed, as are Letters to the Editor. The journal does not at present publish case reports. Exceptionally this may be considered after prior consultation with the Chief Editor via e-mail.
Acta Commentaries
Commentaries are discussion documents or short non-systematic reviews on subjects of current interest or controversy. They should not exceed 1,800 words and not use more than 12 references. Full disclosure of interests is necessary.
Editorials
Editorials and Editorś messages are supplied by the Chief Editor, Editorial Board or International Editors, or others, by invitation only.
Original Articles
Original research may be reported as a Main Article or as a Short Report. A main article of in general between 2,500 and 4,000 words may present the outcome of a large trial, case-control, observational or retrospective study; these must have a full structured abstract (see above) and have in general no more than 30 references. The Journal will consider studies with both negative and positive outcomes (acceptance or rejection of the null hypothesis).
Short Reports
Short reports (1,500-2,500 words) usually detail smaller studies and are permitted with at most one or two tables and/or one illustration and no more than 12 references.
Randomised Controlled Trials Randomised controlled trials require (a) a copy of the ethics approval (or an explanation as to why ethics approval was not received), (b) a CONSORT flowchart/checklist (submitted as a Figure File), example:
http://www.consort-statement.org/Downloads/download.htm, and (c) authors may be asked to submit a copy of the original protocol upon which the trial was based.
Clinical trials should have been pre-registered in free, public clinical trial registries (for example, www.clinicaltrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials-dev.ifpma.org/ or http://www.controlled.trials.com/isrctn). Where a clinical trial registration number is available this should be included with the name of the trial register.If authors wish the editors to consider an unregistered trial explain in the Cover Letter why the trial was not registered.
Research protocols
Research protocols for randomised controlled trials may be published electronically and require a summary of no more than 400 words, which will be printed if the protocol is accepted. A separate document should contain the complete protocol. The relevant Research Ethics Committee approval date and reference number are required, if applicable for the country of origin. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica will be pleased to consider for publication the trial for which the protocol was accepted, subject to satisfactory reviewerś reports in the regular processing of manuscripts.
Acta Reviews
These may be clinical review articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and diagnostic evaluations, between 2500 and 4000 words in general.
Clinical Reviews Clinical review articles should be evidence-based updates of the medical literature, encompassing a broad discussion of the topic under consideration. They can draw on evidence-based and major original articles as well as high quality recommendations and guidelines relevant to the topic. Common databases for this, such as
http://www.clinicalevidence.com,
http://www.cochrane.org/,
http://www.evidence-basedmedicine.com,
http://www.infopoems.com, can be used for reference. The strength and validity of the literature that supports the discussion should be evaluated with reference to meta-analyses, randomised clinical trials with important outcomes, well designed non-randomised clinical trials, clinical cohort and case-control studies, and if relevant, historical, observational and epidemiological studies. Levels of strength of evidence to support main clinical recommendations need to be used and stated (ABC-rating systems). Tabulate material if possible, including major summary points. For reference on how to construct a clinical review a useful source is
http://www.aafp.org/afp/authors.html.
Systematic reviews
For Systematic Reviews, the abstract should be subdivided into the following sequential sections: Background, Objectives, Search Strategy, Selection Criteria, Data Collection and Analysis, Main Results, Conclusions and Keywords. A QUOROM statement checklist is required for systematic review meta-analyses: see
www.consort-statement.org/QUOROM.pdf Systematic reviews should be critical assessments of current evidence covering a broad range of topics of concern in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The text should in general be restricted to a maximum of 4,000 words. Full disclosure of interests is necessary. Quote original articles only, not previous reviews on the same topic unless absolutely necessary. For further advice on writing systematic reviews authors may consult The Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook: http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook
Letters to the Editor
In general, Letters to the Editor should refer to articles published in the Journal no more than 12 weeks before. The original authors will be given an opportunity to present a Reply in the same issue, at the discretion of the Chief Editor. Letters on other matters of interest will also be considered.
Letters should comprise no more than 500 words, include no more than five references, including one to the article under discussion. A topical heading is required and the manuscript must include the full names and affiliations of the signatories.